
Petros Perros is endocrinoloog en hij schreef als editorial in de European Thyroid Journal bij het verschijnen van de nieuwe richtlijn:
‘I made a few rather cynical remarks during my presentation, which got me some laughs by the audience. Unaware that I was speaking to anyone but colleagues, I was confronted at the end of my talk by an angry lady, who turned out to be a patient representative. She made sure I noted that her views and personal experience were very different to what I had portrayed. I had unintentionally offended a hypothyroid patient, which I regretted terribly, but after a lengthy discussion with her, which continued with occasional emails for several months, I was delighted to be asked to act as medical advisor for her thyroid patient-led organization. We remain friends and respect each other, though our views are still different.’
‘On balance, I cautiously welcome the ETA guideline. It is patient centred and will encourage clinicians and disenfranchised patients to engage with each other. This can only be a good thing. The authors have had the courage to take a stance on L-T4 + L-T3 and that is admirable, though it will be perceived as controversial by many of their peers for not being based on evidence. In my view, the proposition to ‘experiment’ with a trial of L-T4 + L-T3 treatment comes with a responsibility that befalls upon the ETA and clinicians who adopt the guideline: to audit it and report back over the next 1–2 years.’
The thyroid community needs to know:
- what proportion of patients presenting with unresolved symptoms while on L-T4 have an alternative diagnosis;
- how often are the target biochemical parameters achieved on L-T4 + L-T3 using the recommended formulae;
- does the conversion from L-T4 monotherapy to combination L-T4 + L-T3 cause periods of instability of the thyroid status;
- how many additional consultations and measurements of thyroid function are generated by conversion to L-T4 + L-T3;
- is L-T4 + L-T3 associated with documented episodes of cardiac arrhythmias or other adverse effects;
- what proportion of patients decide to abandon the L-T4 + L-T3 ‘experiment’, and finally and most importantly,
- what is the patients’ opinion and level of satisfaction with the ‘experiment’?
This is not difficult to do and although it will never answer the important remaining questions about the L-T4 + L-T3 story, it will be hugely valuable for everyday management of patients with hypothyroidism. I expect the guideline will change our practice and will stimulate more research on this fascinating topic.’
Reacties
Een reactie posten